Today Corbyn told his MPs to vote with the government and give Theresa May the power to trigger Article 50. This, though:
The Tories appear to have no plan for Brexit. May saying, during separate speeches “Brexit means Brexit”, and it’ll be a “Brexit that’s right for the country”, as well as “red, white and blue” (and am I the only one to consciously notice the latent National Front connection there?)
Britain is set to leave the EU because just over half of our voting – and more grey – population chose that option in a referendum that was both vague and unBritish. (Should any conservatives other than Peter Hitchens actually care about that sort of thing)
Experts from across the board – and political spectrum – predict Brexit to be an unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that’s why May originally opposed it?
Why has Corbyn’s lot done this?
There used to be a line in the US about how it seemed like the DNC leadership rather exercise full control over the Democratic party than the country. In other words – they rather lose a national election than allow someone from outside their clique to represent the party. (Sanders’ story is nothing new. See Henry Wallace.)
This is my only explanation for what Corbyn’s lot is doing to my party: it seems vitally important to them to take over the party apparatus in toto, even if that means national politics becomes something of an externality. I know, being a member of Labour and Momentum that great efforts are in fact being exerted on the former – and as everyone and their goldfish can see, to the great cost of the latter.
How odd that a group of “internationalists” should take such a limiting perspective.
Economy = downgraded to that of a “developing” country.
Society = ridden by fear and abuse.
Our politics = seized by cynicism, opportunism and mutually assured destruction.
This, all of it, our country chose.
We, those on the Remain side of the argument, seriously misjudged our neighbours and compatriots: many of them really are that stupid. And, no – they cannot be given the benefit of the doubt. Figures from the left, right and centre warned them, the economic institutions and trade unions warned them, the professors and cultural figures warned them, NATO, USA (Trump excluded), Norway’s PM warned them. Warned them what our country would become.
And, nay again, they themselves cannot suddenly pretend that their political analysis is just as deep and deserving of respect as the above.
(In fact, the only figures of note which supported Brexit appeared to be Putin – a long and bitter hater of the EU – and ISIS. The latter has since praised Britain’s move.)
As much as I cannot abide the cult which has slivered up upon and about the grave of that vicious fat dog, Churchill’s words are playing on repeat in my inner ear,
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter
This may help you make sense of Michael Gove’s insight:
…People in this country have had enough of experts
You really have met a cultural incline when expert has become a dirty word, sewn into our porch alongside those other faux-pas (excuse my French) “‘ealth and safety” and “political correctness”.
Of course I’m being unfair: 52% is barely a majority of the voting population, and fairly meaningless of the whole. But it is demonstrative of that cultural strain, long nurtured by demagogues and flustered Cameroons, in this United Kingdom: anti-Brussels, anti-immigrant, anti-Other – becoming something more than a nuance. A new and dangerous voting block that Westminster has no idea of how to counter-act (and may soon not wish to).
A good number of those who put a cross next to Leave seem to have sincerely thought their choice meant, “send the Poles, Pakis and… uh, Polynesians home” (whatever that means). Taking “their” country back so they can set it back on course to backwaterdom, which Britain momentarily detoured from post-WWII. There in the swamp that results they can fester and congeal, filling the pungent air with their pungent thoughts.
And it’s this demographic which knows the least about the history and culture of Britain. When they talk of defending its culture they are almost certainly referring to football hooliganism, shit larger and trash TV – and not the domains of Tolkien, verses of Auden, those skyscapes of Turner. Nor do they acknowledge the Levelers, Chartists and the heroes of the Enlightenment, without which their suffrage would be denied.
(I mean really, just take a look at Britain First’s take on the Peasant’s Revolt here)
Ezra Pound may have been writing of his country of birth, but there is something in Hugh Selwyn Mauberley which does apply here and now, in this Blighted realm where the 52ers reign:
No, hardly, but, seeing he had been born
In a half savage country, out of date;
Bent resolutely on wringing lilies from the acorn;